User:Vdnektc166

000 yuan compensation. In addition

's insurance company refused to accept the appeal. Yesterday, the case in City Intermediate Court upheld the trial. Vehicle Lianhuan Zhuang passers injured in this accident happened two years ago. According to the Court of First Instance to identify, October 31, 2008 9 am, the driver was driving his work a Danmou packaging products for its cars, the Shenzhen-Shantou Highway Kengzi people's courts intersection turn left, hit an opposite direction of travel 668 road transport buses, causing the vehicle Lianhuan Zhuang: transit bus lost control again, and a car parked on the roadside collision knocked the car and cause other two car collision. Ms. Wong and her daughter standing on the pedestrian street and several others, were also injured in the accident bring disaster. By the traffic police department finds Danmou bear the primary responsibility for the accident, bus bus driver Zhang bear secondary responsibility, others are affected resulting Lianhuan Zhuang vehicle drivers and pedestrians is not liable. After the accident,hogan, Ms. Huang was rushed to hospital until the following May 21 until discharged. Assume the Primary, secondary liability two drivers affiliation,louboutin, she advanced a total of 8.2 million yuan for medical expenses. After a judicial appraisal, Ms. Huang's left leg injury for the nine disabled, right arm and rib injuries constitute ten disabled. Ms. Huang ordered the driver involved five cars, company affiliation, the insurance company with a total of ten defendants to court, asking the court to order the defendant to compensate ten their medical expenses, lost income, disability compensation and other losses totaling 24.99 million yuan. A judge awarded 240,000 injured when the court of first instance, the primary responsibility in the accident the driver of packaging products Danmou belongs Center, believes that the center is Miss Huang advance of 5.6 million yuan in medical expenses, and the vehicle has been insured pay compulsory insurance and third party liability insurance, the insurance company should be liable for damages. The car insurance China People's Insurance Company Shenzhen Branch believes that the company should only be used for medical expenses and disability compensation limit liability,hollister, Ms. Huang project and the amount of compensation demanded too much too high,air jordan, there is no legal basis. Other vehicles insurance company or that the claim amount is too high, or should be assumed by the master,abercrombie, secondary liability vehicle insurance company first full payment. Longgang District Court held that the accident vehicles are insured to pay high insurance, Ms. Huang's medical expenses,barbour sale, disability compensation and other losses amount does not exceed the two are responsible for the accident vehicle insurance limits, thus the loss of Ms. Huang should be two vehicle liability insurance company to pay high insurance limits in direct Miss Xiang Huang compensation, the other defendants are not liable. Then the hospital first instance verdict: This vehicle accident two liability insurance company, 12 million yuan,air jordan, respectively, bear the liability should be a total of 24 million yuan compensation for Ms. Wong direct economic losses, Ms. Huang dismissed other claims. Insurance company appealed against the primary responsibility in the accident vehicles insured China People's Insurance Company Shenzhen Branch first instance verdict, the City Court of Appeal. The insurance company appealed that the Court of First Instance sentenced the company has the responsibility to pay high insurance limits, priority liable,doudoune moncler, it is without legal basis. Other no responsibility vehicle insurance company,abercrombie, it should be no obligation to pay compulsory insurance within the limits of joint liability, which bear 36,000 yuan compensation. In addition, Ms. Wong did not submit tax clearance certificate, they work alone pharmacies prove their wages, according to the deficiencies. In addition,abercrombie, hospital food subsidies, appraisal fees and court costs should not be borne by insurance companies. Yesterday, the 40-year-old Ms. Huang personally appear in court to respond, she agrees on the verdict, I hope the second instance upheld the conviction. Other participants in the trial of first instance the defendant, but also on the fact that the first instance court found that some of the basic agrees. But no responsibility for the accident three vehicle's insurance company does not appear in court the respondent,hollister sale, the judge found it impossible to proceed with the hearing, then adjourned. Currently,doudoune moncler, the case is still pending.</p>

相关的主题文章：

• Mother and brother were closed due to disputes with suspected pepper spray liquid vehicle _
• Beijing University graduates to practice once out of the temple by the International Mathematical Olympiad
• four drowning child will soon